Read this to get an idea of what is the current state of Lebanon Under Fire.
You can download it as a pdf, or read it on the page.
The conflict between Lebanon and Israel is a deeply entrenched and tragic saga that has left an indelible mark on Lebanon and its people. It began in 1948, when the creation of Israel led to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. Many of these displaced Palestinians sought refuge in Lebanon, significantly altering the country's demographic and political landscape. This influx of refugees set the stage for future conflicts, as tensions simmered between the displaced Palestinian population and the host Lebanese communities.
In 1978, Israel launched Operation Litani, its first major incursion into Lebanon, aimed at pushing the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) away from its northern border. This military action resulted in widespread destruction and civilian casualties, marking the beginning of a long series of Israeli interventions in Lebanon. However, it was the 1982 invasion that truly devastated Lebanon. Israel's Operation Peace for Galilee, ostensibly aimed at expelling the PLO from Lebanon, led to the Siege of Beirut and the horrific Sabra and Shatila massacre, where an allied Lebanese militia, under the watch of Israeli forces, brutally killed between 460 and 3,500 Palestinian refugees. This massacre is widely condemned as one of the most egregious war crimes of the conflict.
During the subsequent occupation of southern Lebanon, which lasted until 2000, Israel established the South Lebanon Army (SLA) as a proxy force, which committed numerous human rights abuses against the local Lebanese population. The occupation period was marked by frequent clashes and Israeli military operations, including Operation Accountability in 1993 and Operation Grapes of Wrath in 1996. These operations resulted in significant civilian casualties and mass displacement. The Qana massacre in 1996, where 106 civilians were killed while sheltering in a UN compound, stands out as a stark reminder of the brutal nature of the conflict.
Despite Israel's withdrawal in 2000, peace remained elusive. Hezbollah, which had gained strength and popular support as a resistance movement against Israeli occupation, continued to clash with Israeli forces. The situation escalated dramatically in 2006 when Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers, prompting a massive Israeli military response. The 2006 Lebanon War was characterized by widespread aerial bombardment and ground operations that resulted in the deaths of over 1,191 Lebanese, mostly civilians, and caused extensive destruction of Lebanon's infrastructure. Entire neighborhoods were reduced to rubble, and vital services like hospitals, schools, and roads were heavily damaged or destroyed. Many international observers and human rights organizations labeled Israel's actions during this war as war crimes, citing the disproportionate use of force and deliberate targeting of civilian areas.
The latest escalation began in October 2023, with skirmishes and clashes along the border. Israel's military response included airstrikes on Hezbollah positions and populated areas in southern Lebanon. Human Rights Watch documented the use of white phosphorus by Israeli forces, a substance known to cause severe injuries and fires, further exacerbating the suffering of civilians. As the conflict continued into 2024, the humanitarian situation worsened. Tens of thousands of Lebanese were displaced from their homes, seeking refuge in safer areas or even abroad. Infrastructure once again suffered, with homes, schools, hospitals, and roads being targeted and destroyed.
The ongoing conflict poses severe threats to Lebanon. The humanitarian crisis is deepening, with more civilians at risk of injury, death, and displacement. Lebanon's already fragile economy is under immense strain, struggling to cope with the cost of reconstruction and the needs of displaced populations. The environmental impact of the conflict, including the use of illegal munitions, adds another layer of suffering.
The Lebanese people are victims of a long history of Israeli aggression and military dominance. Each phase of the conflict has brought immense suffering, loss, and destruction to Lebanon, reinforcing the perception of Israel as a perpetrator of systematic violence and war crimes.
Security Concerns
Israel often cites security concerns as the primary motive for its military actions in Lebanon. The presence of armed groups like the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in the past, and Hezbollah more recently, near its northern border has been a significant source of anxiety for Israel. These groups have launched attacks and raids into Israeli territory, prompting Israel to carry out preemptive and retaliatory strikes to neutralize perceived threats.
Strategic Control
Israel seeks to maintain a buffer zone to prevent militant groups from using southern Lebanon as a staging ground for attacks. By establishing and supporting proxy forces like the South Lebanon Army (SLA) during its occupation, Israel aimed to create a security belt to keep hostile forces at a distance. This strategy is driven by a desire to protect Israeli settlements and infrastructure from cross-border attacks.
Political Pressure and Domestic Politics
Israeli military actions are also influenced by internal political pressures. Demonstrations of military strength can be used to rally domestic support, especially in times of political instability or elections. Showing a tough stance against groups like Hezbollah can bolster the standing of political leaders and parties within Israel.
Deterrence
Israel aims to deter hostile actions by demonstrating its military capabilities and willingness to respond forcefully. By carrying out large-scale operations and inflicting significant damage, Israel seeks to send a message to Hezbollah and other groups that any aggression will be met with overwhelming force. This doctrine of deterrence is intended to prevent future attacks by making the cost of such actions unacceptably high for adversaries.
Influence Over Regional Dynamics
Israel's interventions in Lebanon are also part of broader regional dynamics. By weakening Hezbollah, which is supported by Iran, Israel aims to reduce Iranian influence in the region. This fits into a larger strategy of countering Iran's regional ambitions and curbing the capabilities of its allies and proxies.
Punitive Measures
There is a punitive aspect to Israel's military strategy, intended to exact a high price for actions taken by Hezbollah and other groups. Operations that target infrastructure and civilian areas, while often criticized as disproportionate, are seen as a means to punish and destabilize areas that support or harbor militants.
The concept of "Greater Israel" refers to a nationalistic vision held by factions within Israel, advocating for the expansion of Israeli territory to include lands historically or biblically associated with ancient Israel. This idea has been associated with various interpretations, ranging from specific territorial ambitions to broader ideological and religious aspirations.
The conflict on Lebanon's southern border with Israel has deep historical roots, marked by periods of intense military engagement, occupation, and temporary peace.
1948 Arab-Israeli War: The creation of Israel and the subsequent displacement of Palestinians, many of whom sought refuge in Lebanon.
1978 and 1982 Israeli Invasions: Israel invaded Lebanon to target the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), leading to occupation of southern Lebanon until 2000.
1993 and 1996 Operations: Israeli military operations aimed at Hezbollah, causing significant casualties and displacement.
2000 Israeli Withdrawal: Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon after an 18-year occupation.
2006 Lebanon War: Sparked by Hezbollah's capture of two Israeli soldiers, this 34-day war caused extensive destruction and loss of life.
1982 Lebanon War
1993 Operation Accountability
1996 Operation Grapes of Wrath
2006 Lebanon War
2023-2024 Escalations
1982 Lebanon War
1993 Operation Accountability
1996 Operation Grapes of Wrath
2006 Lebanon War
2023-2024 Escalations
Timeline of Recent Escalation
October 2023:
Initial Skirmishes: Tensions escalated following clashes between Hezbollah and Israeli forces along the border.
Israeli Airstrikes: Israel conducted airstrikes on southern Lebanon, targeting Hezbollah positions.
November 2023:
Use of White Phosphorus: Human Rights Watch documented the use of white phosphorus by Israeli forces in populated areas, causing severe injuries and fires.
December 2023 - January 2024:
Continued Airstrikes: Israeli airstrikes intensified, targeting infrastructure and civilian areas, leading to significant casualties and displacement.
February 2024:
Retaliation by Hezbollah: Hezbollah launched rockets into northern Israel, prompting further Israeli military responses.
March 2024:
Humanitarian Crisis: The ongoing conflict led to a humanitarian crisis, with tens of thousands displaced and significant destruction of homes and infrastructure.
Damage and Humanitarian Impact
Casualties:
Displacement:
Population Displacement: Approximately 93,000 people have been displaced from southern Lebanon, seeking refuge in other parts of the country or abroad.
Infrastructure Damage:
Threat of Escalation
The current conflict poses several severe threats:
Aita al-Shaab - 190
Ras al-Naqoura - 154
Houla - 143
Tayr Harfa - 139
Alma ash-Shaab - 134
Israel's widespread use of white phosphorus in south Lebanon is putting civilians at grave risk and contributing to civilian displacement, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch verified the use of white phosphorus munitions by Israeli forces in at least 17 municipalities across south Lebanon since October 2023, including 5 municipalities where airburst munitions were unlawfully used overpopulated residential areas.
White phosphorus is a chemical substance dispersed in artillery shells, bombs, and rockets that ignites when exposed to oxygen. Its incendiary effects inflict death or cruel injuries that result in lifelong suffering. It can set homes, agricultural areas, and other civilian objects on fire. Under international humanitarian law, the use of airburst white phosphorus is unlawfully indiscriminate in populated areas and otherwise does not meet the legal requirement to take all feasible precautions to avoid civilian harm.
Comments for ... 'General-overview-of-the-conflict' Page